English must change.Read the manifesto.
← On Effective Writing
15 / GRAMMAR FOR SHARED ENGLISH DRAFT FOR REVIEW

And versus or: specify the requirement.

Could a careful reader still send the wrong documents?
Why shared English asks more of every writer. ↗

Will you reject an application containing both?

An application asks for a CV or a cover letter. You send both, hoping to be helpful. Has that extra effort met the requirement or broken the rule? I want an instruction to answer that question before the applicant prepares the submission. A few words can distinguish permission to send both from a demand to choose exactly one.

See the supporting references.
Read the example.BlueTealVioletYellowMatching colours connect related words. Each example names the roles and explains the change.

Follow the instruction through.

01

Require both documents.

Constructed teaching example
Constructed requirement
The application must include a CV and a cover letter.
Permitted submissions
CV only: no · Letter only: no · Both: yes
Would a CV alone meet the requirement? The instruction requires the pair.
02

Allow either document or both.

Constructed teaching example
Constructed requirement
The application must include a CV or a cover letter or both.
Permitted submissions
CV only: yes · Letter only: yes · Both: yes
What changes? A submission with neither document still fails the requirement.
03

Require exactly one document.

Constructed teaching example
Constructed requirement
The application must include either a CV or a cover letter, but not both.
Permitted submissions
CV only: yes · Letter only: yes · Both: no
What changes? The final phrase excludes the combination without permitting an empty submission.
Test every possible submission.
Constructed application requirements
SubmissionBoth requiredOne or bothExactly one
NeitherNoNoNo
CV onlyNoYesYes
Letter onlyNoYesYes
BothYesYesNo
A requirement can treat a missing document differently from an extra document.

See the published wording.

PUBLISHED WORDING · HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE
Many buildings have a mixture of natural and mechanical ventilation, with either (or both) systems in different spaces.

Do not make every ordinary choice sound like a contract.

I favour explicit alternatives when accepting or rejecting a submission depends on the combination. The HSE example shows how “or both” can permit a combination without a long explanation. An informal choice with an obvious meaning may need no such expansion. Test the real consequence of ambiguity before adding a qualification to every “or”.

References and evidence

  1. Health and Safety Executive, “Ventilation in the workplace”, overview ↩
Read the evidence and its limits.

The HSE wording explicitly allows a combination through the phrase “or both”. This published example demonstrates the usefulness of stating the combined possibility. The example does not establish one universal interpretation of “or”, so my recommendation asks writers to specify the intended requirement.

CONTINUE READING

Grammar with a purpose

A grammatical distinction should earn attention through the meaning the distinction makes available. The collection explores that argument through sentences that readers can examine for themselves. Choose another essay and compare the choices.

Explore the essays. ↗